Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> And overall, I'd think it would make the feature a
> *lot* less useful; basically it would encourage a
> lot of DBAs to organize their schemas by
> security level, which is not really what schemas
> are for.
>
that's not the way Oracle do things? one schema per
user and the objects of the user in its own schema? at
least i was tought that way.
regards,
Jaime Casanova
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Oleg Bartunov | Date: 2005-02-01 20:11:15 |
| Subject: Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0) |
| Previous: | From: Gaetano Mendola | Date: 2005-02-01 18:17:52 |
| Subject: Re: weird behaviour on DISTINCT ON |