Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> And overall, I'd think it would make the feature a
> *lot* less useful; basically it would encourage a
> lot of DBAs to organize their schemas by
> security level, which is not really what schemas
> are for.
that's not the way Oracle do things? one schema per
user and the objects of the user in its own schema? at
least i was tought that way.
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2005-02-01 20:11:15|
|Subject: Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0) |
|Previous:||From: Gaetano Mendola||Date: 2005-02-01 18:17:52|
|Subject: Re: weird behaviour on DISTINCT ON|