Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Our getopt_long() doesn't do abbreviations or NLS

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Our getopt_long() doesn't do abbreviations or NLS
Date: 2005-02-01 09:56:12
Message-ID: 200502011056.12505.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
> does not accept abbreviated names for long options:

That is known, but since we don't advertise that feature, it's not a 
problem.

> Barring objections, I'm going to modify our version to allow unique
> abbreviations too.

Sure, if you like.

> Should it be gettext'ified?

Probably.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-02-01 10:02:52
Subject: Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-02-01 09:53:48
Subject: Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group