Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
> does not accept abbreviated names for long options:
That is known, but since we don't advertise that feature, it's not a
problem.
> Barring objections, I'm going to modify our version to allow unique
> abbreviations too.
Sure, if you like.
> Should it be gettext'ified?
Probably.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2005-02-01 10:02:52 |
| Subject: Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all |
| Previous: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2005-02-01 09:53:48 |
| Subject: Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... |