Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-28 15:33:03
Message-ID: 20050128153303.GC9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> Slony do not use RAM ... but PostgreSQL will need RAM for accessing a database 
> of 50 Gb ... so having two servers with the same configuration replicated by 
> slony do not slove the problem of the scalability of the database ...

You could use SSD for your storage.  That'd make it go rather quickly
even if it had to seek on disk.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2005-01-28 15:34:25
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2005-01-28 15:31:38
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group