Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-28 15:29:58
Message-ID: 20050128152958.GA9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
>
> I don't insist about have data in RAM .... but when you use PostgreSQL with
> big database you know that for quick access just for reading the index file
> for example it's better to have many RAM as possible ... I just want to be
> able to get a quick access with a growing and growind database ...

Well, in any case, you need much better hardware than you're looking
at. I mean, dual Xeon with 2 Gig isn't hardly big iron. Why don't
you try benchmarking on a honking big box -- IBM P690 or a big Sun
(I'd counsel against that, though) or something like that? Or even
some Opterons. Dual Xeon is probablt your very worst choice at the
moment.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-01-28 15:31:38 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Previous Message Pallav Kalva 2005-01-28 15:15:50 Poor Performance on Postgres 8.0