Re: reltuples after vacuum and analyze

I know it is accurate.
My question is why the table takes
2023024KB after analyzed?
And why it does not shink to 30088 after vacuumed?

I know "vacuum full verbose"
will force it shrink to
reasonable size. But I do not understand
why "analyze" bloats the table size so
big??

Please note all above commands are done within
minutes and I truely do not believe the table
of 189165 rows takes that much space.

Furthermore, I notice last weekly "vacuum full"
even did not reclaim the space back.

Thanks,

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Litao Wu <litaowu(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Then how to explain relpages
> > (size_kb in result returned)?
>
> relpages should be accurate in either case, since we
> get that by asking
> the kernel (lseek).
>
> regards, tom lane
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com