> Perhaps a good way to accomplish both goals is to have the set of
> human-readable views, and to add columns to the system tables/views that
> conform with the new, more logical naming convention. This way people
> accessing system information programmatically can use pg_catalog (and
> migrate to the new naming convention), while people who are doing ad-hoc
> queries can just hit the human-readable stuff.
If you think that anyone on this list is going to let us re-name columns in
the system *tables*, you're on more pain meds than I realized ...
And in what way is using fully qualified names programmatically a problem?
Aglio Database Solutions
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2005-01-23 23:41:55|
|Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)|
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-01-23 22:45:26|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers] Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2|