Hi Stephen,

> > I have to disagree with your model. Roles are not so simple like
> you
> > try to describe in your patch. I'm suposing this because your using
> > role* in all of the 'pg_shadow'.
> 
> The particular name isn't really important- and don't take it to mean
> very much...
> 
OK. So let it 'use*'.

> > What's Role? A set of relations with their respective privileges
> and
> > a set of users and/or roles.
> 
> That's a good question- I'm not really very familiar with roles. :) 
> I'm
> honestly more interested in group ownership...
> 
OK. Thinking better, keep up your work. I'm going to keep my eyes on
it.


=====
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br


	
	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ - Internet rápida e grátis

In response to

• Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED at 2005-01-22 19:49:06 from Stephen Frost

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-01-22 20:57:22
	Subject: Re: ARC patent
Previous:	From: Nicolai Tufar	Date: 2005-01-22 20:19:20
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Dave Page	Date: 2005-01-22 20:51:00
	Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum/Win32 Fixes
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-01-22 20:06:33
	Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)