Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-20 16:13:25
Message-ID: 20050120161325.GR10437@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

* Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com (Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com) wrote:
> I think maybe a SAN in conjunction with tablespaces might be the answer.
> Still need one honking server.

That's interesting- can a PostgreSQL partition be acress multiple
tablespaces?

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-01-20 16:31:29 Re:
Previous Message amrit 2005-01-20 16:10:03 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering