Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...
Date: 2005-01-18 15:49:43
Message-ID: 20050118154943.GA15110@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:22:58AM +0200, Nicolai Tufar wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Patents do not transcend international border. They need
> to be applied for in each country separately.
> 
> To ease  the process of applying for patents in many countries
> at once Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) was formed. When you

It's also true that many countried have bilateral treatings
respecting the "intellectual property" in the other country.  Canada
has such with the US, as far as I know, so that it is possible to
request injunctive relief in Canada for violation of a patent which is
grated by the USPTO.  The relief is limited, however, and requires
certain hoop-jumping which is sort of tiresome.  Unless, of course,
you have a large, full time legal staff and you're already a
multinational.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-01-18 15:53:27
Subject: Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
Previous:From: John DeSoiDate: 2005-01-18 15:16:44
Subject: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group