Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >> What will you do if the patent is granted, 8.0 is out there with the
> >> offending code, and you get a cease-and-desist letter from IBM
> >> demanding the removal of all offending code from the Net?
> > We can modify the code slightly to hopefully avoid the patent. With the
> > US granting patents on even obvious ideas, I would think that most large
> > software projects, including commercial ones, already have tons of
> > patent violations in their code. Does anyone think otherwise?
> I think there is zero probability of being sued by IBM in the near
> future. They would instantly destroy the credibility and good
> relationships they've worked so hard to build up with the entire
> open source community.
> However, I don't want to be beholden to IBM indefinitely --- in five
> years their corporate strategy might change. I think that a reasonable
> response to this is to plan to get rid of ARC, or at least modify the
> code enough to avoid the patent, in time for 8.1. (It's entirely likely
> that that will happen before the patent issues, anyway.)
We may already have modified the code enough to avoid the patent.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2005-01-17 20:02:41|
|Subject: Re: ARC patent|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-17 19:58:33|
|Subject: Re: ARC patent |