On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> It might be worthwhile having commit() throw an exception if the
> transaction did not actually commit, rather than only reporting
> server-generated errors. What do people think?
Sounds like a good idea.
> It'd be possible to have optional "automatic savepoint wrapping" in the
> driver, where every user query was transparently wrapped in
> subtransaction. You might prefer to write the code to make the driver do
> this, rather than change your application.
Also seems like a useful feature at first blush.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Dave Cramer||Date: 2005-01-14 22:12:16|
|Subject: Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?)|
|Previous:||From: Stephen McConnell||Date: 2005-01-14 21:59:21|
|Subject: An I/O error occured while sending to the backend.|