Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > With the several backend related changes that have gone in over the past 
> > couple of days, are we looking at an RC6? :(
> 
> Nothing that I've put in seems significant enough to need an RC6.  The
> only recent patch that really has any risk of destabilization is the one
> that caused RC5 (the SMgr hashtable backlink stuff).  I'd prefer to see
> people go full bore on testing RC5 than spend time updating to a new RC.

Agreed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for at 2005-01-13 21:22:21 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: User Mha	Date: 2005-01-13 22:19:09
	Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Use LoginUser() and CreateProcessAsUser() when the
Previous:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2005-01-13 21:24:50
	Subject: pgsql: Translation updates