Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I've never seen one that changes any chars <= 127. But it's possible the
> editor in this case wrote down a file in the wrong charset.
> Looking at http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/wincp.mspx, "*"
> is 002A in *every single one*, inlcuding japanese.
> Looking at http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/oem/437.htm, it
> shows that it's 002A in the very encoding Simon said was used in this
> case. So it is in
> http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/oem/850.htm, which is the
> OEM codepage used in Swedish windows.
> I'm having trouble seeing why '*' would have a different value in
> different codepages. I'm wondering if we're going down the wrong road
> completely here?
Agreed. The idea that <=127 codes are different for different encodings
(code pages) seems impossible.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2005-01-11 16:29:17|
|Subject: Re: More Code Page wierdness|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2005-01-11 16:01:25|
|Subject: Re: More Code Page wierdness |