Re: Warp

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Eric Caloone <eric(dot)caloone(at)free(dot)fr>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Warp
Date: 2005-01-09 22:05:37
Message-ID: 200501092205.j09M5bB16609@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
>
> > I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
> > our CVS source but only with modified source.
>
> We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
> a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.
>
> There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
> responsibility for it ;-)

Right, I assume the same for OS/2. It is mentioned in the FAQ and has
a URL. That's as far as we can go until the OS/2 port person submits
information on what changes he had to make to get it to work and we
incorporate his changes in our code.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: Warp at 2005-01-09 22:02:33 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Warner 2005-01-10 01:54:36 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-09 22:02:33 Re: Warp