Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Or not, it's just a bitter and late (because of my bitterness) response
> to the rejection of my IDENTITY/GENERATED patches.
> Where's the much praised standard behaviour on standard syntax?
> So much for hypocrisy.
Hm? There's a difference between extensions and failing to comply with
what the spec says is the behavior of the syntax it provides.
I feel bad that you put so much work into what now seems to be a dead
end (at least until we can get some clarification about what the
committee really intends). But look at the bright side: you learned
quite a bit about the innards of Postgres. Hopefully your next project
will be more successful.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2007-05-19 05:05:14|
|Subject: Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2007-05-18 20:01:06|
|Subject: Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause|