Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one
Date: 2004-12-31 01:16:18
Message-ID: 200412310116.iBV1GIF22965@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make
> > clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just
> > a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached
> > patch.
> 
> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it?  Might be worth diffing a make
> distclean'd tree against a virgin one.

I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a
configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps should do it
too.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-31 03:57:26
Subject: Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-12-31 01:14:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group