Re: locales and encodings on Windows

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > Magnus Hagander wrote on 22.12.2004 13:14:
> > >>> [about PG not supporting Unicode on Windows]
> > >>
> > >> PostgreSQL uses the OS functinos to do locale handling. The other
> > >> databases usually implement their own (or use a library that does it,
> > >> but they do not rely on the OS)
> >
> > > Being a developer myself I can understand this reason, but in the PG
> > > context I'm a User I not having Unicode support is my eyes a very big
> > > deficiency which gives the whole Win32 a semi-professional "touch".
> >
> > > Unicode is something very important and I do hope this will be solved in on
> > > of the next releases.
> >
> > [ shrug... ] It can't be too important to Windows users, since their
> > platform doesn't support it.
>
> And what solution options do we have? Is bundling our own Unicode
> library something we even want to consider? I would think not.

If the Win32 Unicode implemetation is buggy, can we work around the bugs
in our code?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073