Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: uptime function to postmaster

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: uptime function to postmaster
Date: 2004-12-22 05:00:38
Message-ID: 20041222050038.GA3720@dcc.uchile.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:57:34AM -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:

Hi,

> Patch updated. I improved the function output too.

Is it really a good idea to have a new file for only one function?
We regularly see complaints about not wanting to do basic source code
cleanup because not wanting to disrupt CVS history ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"El hombre nunca sabe de lo que es capaz hasta que lo intenta" (C. Dickens)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-22 05:02:14
Subject: Re: Bgwriter behavior
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-12-22 04:50:44
Subject: Re: Bgwriter behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group