Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LockObject patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LockObject patch
Date: 2004-12-20 20:48:00
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with.  It's almost
> > the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it
> > expands LOCKTAG with a ClassId attribute, and provides a LockObject
> > method to allow locking arbitrary objects.
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be possible to clean up the "XactLockTable"
> kluge with this --- ie, instead of denoting transaction locks by a
> special relation ID, denote them by a special class ID.  That might just
> move the kluginess from one place to another, but it's worth thinking about.

How about locking the special class InvalidOid?  We don't use that ATM

Anything else would require having a special relation registered, which
is where we are now ...

Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"La rebeldía es la virtud original del hombre" (Arthur Schopenhauer)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Guillaume LELARGEDate: 2004-12-20 20:49:07
Subject: Update for french pg_resetxlog.po file
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-20 20:09:31
Subject: Re: LockObject patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group