--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Harry <postituk(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > In hindsight I would have done some things differently, like
> posting to
> > one of the lists. If you think that it would be better for people
> > ask the list and run from there then I will leave it.
> Well, we should certainly encourage people to post such problems to
> the lists; that's the only way we'd ever find out about common-mode
> failures that we might be able to fix or defend against. But I don't
> see any reason that we can't start to pull together some collected
> wisdom. The idea has been discussed before but no one's really
> stepped up to do the writing. If you want to give it a go, by all
> means ...
I will start putting together some basic guidlelines on what to do when
someone has a suspected corruption ie get on the mailing lists and
start asking questions, what constitutes a sensible question, what not
to do etc. I will keep it very basic to start with and we will see
where it goes from there.
If anyone has any sugestions on things that would be good to add to a
database recovery chapter then let me know and I will add it to the list.
Join team plico.
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-12-21 01:02:51|
|Subject: Re: Week numbering|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2004-12-20 07:19:04|
|Subject: Re: Docs build failure on plpgsql.sgml|