On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> > Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when decibel(at)decibel(dot)org ("Jim C. Nasby") would write:
> >> In PostgreSQL, there's currently no way to assume the identity of
> >> another user.
> > I'm confused at that...
> > There seem to be ways at time of connection establishment, whether via
> > the psql "-U" option, or the PGconnect "dbuser=foo" option, or during
> > a psql session via "\c - newuser".
> Not to mention SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
Doh! Completely forgot about that.
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2004-12-20 06:18:05|
|Subject: pgjob registered on pgFoundary|
|Previous:||From: Vincent Hikida||Date: 2004-12-20 02:55:01|
|Subject: Re: UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT|