Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Seqscan rather than Index

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Seqscan rather than Index
Date: 2004-12-17 22:09:07
Message-ID: 20041217220907.GA10313@uio.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:56:27PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm a bit unsure -- should counting ~3 million rows (no OIDs, PG 7.4,
> everything in cache, 32-byte rows) take ~3500ms on an Athlon 64 2800+?

(I realize I was a bit unclear here. This is a completely separate case, not
related to the original poster -- I was just wondering if what I'm seeing is
normal or not.)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-17 22:20:47
Subject: Re: Error in VACUUM FULL VERBOSE ANALYZE (not enough memory)
Previous:From: Pailloncy Jean-GerardDate: 2004-12-17 21:59:07
Subject: Re: Error in VACUUM FULL VERBOSE ANALYZE (not enough memory)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group