Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
Date: 2004-12-07 14:58:21
Message-ID: 20041207145821.GB27594@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:29:49PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Both you and Andrew are arguing software ... this discussion is about
> project sponsors / contributions ... or, at least, started as such .

Well, specific contributions to the project (imagine, for instance,
native Cognos support) which are hosted elsewhere, and are closed
software, but which involve (for example) significant advocacy work
on the part of the supporting organisation, still seem to be a case
covered by Josh's original question. If Oracle did a "Power of
Linux" advert, I think it'd still be a contribution to Linux, no?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2004-12-07 14:58:37 PostgreSQL enterprise references
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2004-12-07 14:37:39 Re: Press FAQ/Volunteer FAQ