Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in
Date: 2004-12-03 22:29:41
Message-ID: 20041203182919.R87096@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Just as an FYI ... this commit made it into RC1 ... anything after this 
won't unless I re-tag/package ...


On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> Log Message:
> -----------
> As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in these four join queries, we had
> better make sure the sort order is totally specified; else we get burnt
> by platform-specific behavior of qsort() with equal keys.  Per buildfarm
> results.
>
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>    pgsql/src/test/regress/expected:
>        join.out (r1.21 -> r1.22)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/join.out.diff?r1=1.21&r2=1.22)
>    pgsql/src/test/regress/sql:
>        join.sql (r1.14 -> r1.15)
>        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql.diff?r1=1.14&r2=1.15)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-03 22:53:36
Subject: Re: pgsql: As long as we're forcing an ORDER BY in
Previous:From: PostgreSQL DaemonDate: 2004-12-03 22:24:55
Subject: pgsql: tag configure for rc1 ..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group