Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I hope this does not indicate that you are planning to commit that patch
> >> on the day before RC1.
> > I am applying it. It was added to the queue yesterday or the day
> > before. I don't consider it a feature addition but rather an addition
> > for portability with Win32. I don't see how it affects anything unless
> > you use that encoding.
> If it contains any core-dump-grade bugs, it can be used to cause denial
> of service on any platform. And how can you possibly not consider it a
> feature addition?
> I'll hold still for now, but if I see so much as one compiler warning
> out of it, it's going away again.
Sorry, I mean the optimizer cost changes you made.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-12-02 22:28:23|
|Subject: pgsql: On win32, there is currently no way to get the equivalent |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-12-02 22:27:17|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: New Directory|