Re: USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...

From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle(at)freenet(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...
Date: 2004-12-01 18:38:26
Message-ID: 20041201183826.GQ18913@freenet.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Am 2004-12-01 10:45:51, schrieb Joel:

> Suggested questions:
>
> (1) If there were a USENET newsfeed, under comp.databases.postgresql.*,
> of one or more of the current postgresql mailing lists, I would

> (c) use the mailing lists primarily,

> (2) If there were a separate USENET comp.databases.postgresql newsgroup
> created, I would

> (c) use the mailing lists primarily,

> (3) Concerning USENET, I would prefer

> (b) that the mailing lists and USENET be kept seperate,

> (4) If the mailing lists are gated to USENET, I would prefer

> (a) that the current SPAM moderation policy apply to both,
> (c) that kooks who post to USENET be tarred and feathered 8-*, or

> Please not that this is not an attempt at a survey, see 3c and 4c. It is
> only a suggestion.

For me a recomand :-)

Greetings
Michelle

--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

In response to

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2004-12-02 03:14:41 Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin III 1.2.0 Released
Previous Message Woodchuck Bill 2004-12-01 18:25:53 Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Frankel 2004-12-01 18:48:40 Re: data integrity and inserts
Previous Message Woodchuck Bill 2004-12-01 18:25:53 Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-01 19:10:31 Re: Increasing the length of
Previous Message Brett Schwarz 2004-12-01 18:35:32 Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl