Re: problematic upgrade

From: "Marcin Gil" <marcin(dot)gil(at)audax(dot)com(dot)pl>
To:
Cc: "'PGSQL-Novice'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problematic upgrade
Date: 2004-11-30 08:48:07
Message-ID: 20041130084808.0B4F61881CC0@hermes2.vernet.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

----Original Message----
From: pgsql-novice-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-novice-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 8:31 PM
To: Jeff Flowers
Cc: PGSQL-Novice
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] problematic upgrade

> layout), and I'm amazed that the thing appeared to work at all.
>
That shows only one thing: the highest quality of PostgreSQL.
Even if user did something as stupid, these piece still works
just like a Glock 17 (shots under water, dirtied with sand).
Now he will have to "bite the bullet" ;)

Now is there a way to recover (I have to give him a solution)?
My thought: downgrade to 7.3.x, pg_dump, upgrade to 7.4, pg_restore.
Will this work?

Regards,
-Marcin Gil
--
OIS "Audax" Sp. z o.o., Tomaszów Mazowiecki, ul. Barlickiego 4
tel. (+48 44) 7247530 ext. 22, fax. (+48 44) 7247530 ext. 25, mobile
+48 509229662

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hermann(Software) 2004-11-30 09:31:00 Re: views with parameters
Previous Message Evert Meulie 2004-11-30 07:33:33 Re: What causes 'FATAL: invalid cache id: 30' in my postgresql