Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...

From: jseymour(at)linxnet(dot)com (Jim Seymour)
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Date: 2004-11-29 12:35:41
Message-ID: 20041129123541.7BCAA430E@jimsun.linxnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


Chris Green <chris(at)areti(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:34:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> > much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
> >
> Personally I'm against it because it means that I'll often get two
> replies when people reply to my postings. However it's not a big
> issue for me.

Actually, it would result in just the opposite.

Jim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Green 2004-11-29 12:49:46 Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Previous Message Tatu Salminen 2004-11-29 12:02:13 Inheritance in Postgres ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Green 2004-11-29 12:49:46 Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 2004-11-29 11:29:02 Re: Stopgap solution for table-size-estimate updatingproblem