Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...

From: jseymour(at)linxnet(dot)com (Jim Seymour)
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Date: 2004-11-29 03:13:06
Message-ID: 20041129031306.69C5A430E@jimsun.linxnet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> 
> 
> What is the general opinion of this?  I'd like to implement it, but not so 
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...

The procmail rules I set up for each mailing list to which I subscribe
sets Reply-To to the mailing list *unless* there's already a Reply-To
set.  If you're going to do it, that's what I'd recommend doing.

Jim

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-11-29 03:16:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-11-29 02:45:20
Subject: Re: Auto Vacuum

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-11-29 03:16:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2004-11-29 02:48:54
Subject: Re: sequencing two tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group