Simon Riggs wrote:
> Could I suggest that we re-work the TODO list slightly, with regard to
> mentioning the ANSI SQL standard?
> As of last count, we have 14 items listed which would take PostgreSQL
> into full SQL:2003 Core conformance. Troels Arvin has recently listed
> some of these as "low hanging fruit" in the recent thread about SQL
> conformance related patch,
> Some SQL:2003 features are mentioned in other parts of the TODO list,
> though we don't refer to whether these are Mandatory or Optional (e.g.
> MERGE is Optional). ISTM that it would be useful to group the Mandatory
> ones together into a new section of the TODO list: "SQL:2003 Core".
> I'm aware that a number of those are possibly deliberately not
> supported, in which case, we could mention those in brackets or simply
> leave them off the list etc..
Yes, we could create a new section or add SQL:2003 identifiers as part
of the description for certain items.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2004-11-28 22:16:19|
|Subject: Re: Stopgap solution for table-size-estimate updating|
|Previous:||From: Troels Arvin||Date: 2004-11-28 21:58:36|
|Subject: Re: Adding a suffix array index|