Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large Object support for a DB FS

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large Object support for a DB FS
Date: 2004-11-28 10:43:24
Message-ID: 20041128114324.G565@hermes.hilbert.loc (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
> I then proceeded with implementing my own block-oriented data table
> using bytea for storage.  This approach has been more flexible but has a
> couple of draw-backs:
> 
>   1. To partially update a bytea field, I have to load it first,
>      resulting in the overhead of an extra query.
> 
>   2. There is more overhead from the extra queries required to manage
>      the block table.  The result is a large CPU hit for simple I/O.
I'm sure there's quite a few people who'd be very delighted
if you chose to implement range-update/append support for bytea !

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-11-28 18:26:44
Subject: Re: XUL and mozilla/firefox SQL extension
Previous:From: Net Virtual Mailing ListsDate: 2004-11-28 10:01:25
Subject: Re: Why the current setup of pgsql.* and

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group