Re: [PERFORMANCE] Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escribió:
> "Constantin Teodorescu" <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> writes:
> > If I will choose to keep a mirror of every
> > workstation database in a
> > separate schema in the central database that mean
> > that I will have 3500 different schemas.
>
> > Is there any limit or any barrier that could stop
> > this kind of approach or make things go slower?
>
> Would you need to put them all into "search_path" at
> once?
>
> I'm not sure what the scaling issues might be for
> long search_paths, but I wouldn't be surprised if
> it's bad. But as long as you don't do that,
> I don't believe there will be any problems.
>

if i do a select with fully qualified table names it
will search in the search_path or it will go directly
to the schema?

Just for know.

regards,
Jaime Casanova

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com