On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Don Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:48:34 +0000, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
> > Don Drake wrote:
> > > select 'some text, should be null:'|| NULL
> > >
> > > This returns NULL and no other text. Why is that? I wasn't expecting
> > > the "some text.." to disappear altogether.
> > >
> > > Is this a bug?
> > No. Null is "unknown" if you append unknown (null) to a piece of text,
> > the result is unknown (null) too.
> > If you're using NULL to mean something other than unknown, you probably
> > want to re-examine your reasons why.
> I'm using NULL to mean no value. Logically, NULL is unknown, I agree.
> I'm trying to dynamically create an INSERT statement in a function
> that sometimes receives NULL values.
> This is still strange to me. In Oracle, the same query would not
> replace the *entire* string with a NULL, it treats the NULL as a no
Oracle has some incompatibilities with the SQL spec (at least 92/99) wrt
NULLs and empty strings so it isn't a good comparison point. The spec is
pretty clear that if either argument to concatenation is NULL the output
> I can't find in the documentation where string concatenation of any
> string and NULL is NULL.
I'm not sure it does actually. I'd have expected to see some general text
on how most operators return NULL for NULL input but a quick scan didn't
In response to
pgsql-sql by date
|Next:||From: Mischa Sandberg||Date: 2004-11-19 19:23:43|
|Subject: Re: SQL Question|
|Previous:||From: Don Drake||Date: 2004-11-19 18:40:02|
|Subject: Re: NULLS and string concatenation|