Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

test coverage (was: Re: JDBC CTS 1.2.1)

From: Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: test coverage (was: Re: JDBC CTS 1.2.1)
Date: 2004-11-18 21:19:50
Message-ID: 200411181619.50664@vadim.nasardinov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 15:12, Kris Jurka wrote:
> You seem to be going through some complicated gyrations to test
> outdated software.  Why not test 8.0beta and CTS 1.3.1?

I _am_ going to run CTS 1.3.1 sometime soon.  Just wanted to make sure
I understood what the story was with 1.2.1.  When I first posted my
results in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2004-10/msg00279.php, no one
seemed to know whether or not 510 failures out of 1778 tests was the
correct number and why the failure rate was so high.  I now have a
satisfactory answer to that question.  In case anyone cares, my
scripts for running CTS 1.2.1 and generating an error report can be
found here:
  http://people.redhat.com/vadimn/scratch/pgsql-jdbc/cts/

Dave suggested repeatedly that energy would be better spent on
expanding existing test coverage.  I agree that this is a worthwhile
goal and will be happy to help when and where I can.

Here's what the current coverage looks like:
  http://people.redhat.com/vadimn/scratch/pgsql-jdbc/emma/2004-11-18/


Vadim


In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: jessica xingzc_heDate: 2004-11-18 22:00:21
Subject: how to create an object of java.sql.Array
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2004-11-18 18:58:00
Subject: Re: 1+1+16 = 18 failures

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group