Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: persistence of java objects

From: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "jessica xingzc_he" <xingzc_he(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: persistence of java objects
Date: 2004-11-09 16:48:57
Message-ID: 20041109174857.0a56cfb8@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Hi, Jessica,

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:05:44 -0600
"jessica xingzc_he" <xingzc_he(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Does postgresql support this? if i want a column of a table for the 
> persistence of instance of java objects, and use ResultSet.getObject() and 
> ResultSet.updateObjecct() to access them. if so, what data type the column 
> should be?

Currently, there's no support for general Java objects.

But maybe what you really need is a persistance framework. Hibernate
currently seems to be a reasonable one, and it supports PostgreSQL.

HTH,
Markus

-- 
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 z├╝rich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Markus SchaberDate: 2004-11-09 16:49:00
Subject: Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2004-11-09 16:48:19
Subject: Re: driver beta release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group