| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Date: | 2004-11-04 01:50:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20041103214956.L82047@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Justin Clift wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> <snip>
>> I posted once asking about that, but got no responses :)
>>
>> Here is a vacuum verbose on gborg's database:
>>
>> INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7454 pages stored; 23072 total pages
>> needed
>> DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared
>> memory.
>> and this is portal:
>>
>> INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7425 pages stored; 23024 total pages
>> needed
>> DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared
>> memory.
>>
>> so, you tell me ... should I increase them? I haven't been able to find
>> any docs that talk about this :(
>
> Hmmmm, what are the fsm settings for that postgresql.conf?
Ummmm ... the same as what the DETAIL line above states? :)
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-04 01:53:43 | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-04 01:45:31 | Re: modifying a TupleTableSlot |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-04 01:53:43 | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2004-11-04 01:24:32 | Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org |