Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Date: 2004-10-29 00:43:48
Message-ID: 200410282043.48439.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
On Thursday 28 October 2004 17:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Alexey,
>
> > Some of the hoops to jump through: pgsql-www list is not open for
> > subscriptions. I didn't understand this back then and don't understand it
> > now: if pgsql-hackers can be open, why pgsql-www can't?
>
> It is open, now.   We just discussed it last week, when Robert wanted to
> close it.
>

Better check your archives. I've never advocated closing the list, quite the 
contrary I've always thought the list should be completely open. and that 
some of our other lists/address's should be as well. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-29 00:52:46
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-10-29 00:06:52
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-29 00:52:46
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-10-29 00:06:52
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group