Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Date: 2004-10-29 00:43:48
Message-ID: 200410282043.48439.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Thursday 28 October 2004 17:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Alexey,
>
> > Some of the hoops to jump through: pgsql-www list is not open for
> > subscriptions. I didn't understand this back then and don't understand it
> > now: if pgsql-hackers can be open, why pgsql-www can't?
>
> It is open, now. We just discussed it last week, when Robert wanted to
> close it.
>

Better check your archives. I've never advocated closing the list, quite the
contrary I've always thought the list should be completely open. and that
some of our other lists/address's should be as well.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-29 00:52:46 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-29 00:06:52 Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-29 00:52:46 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-29 00:06:52 Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal