Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()
Date: 2004-10-28 22:34:12
Message-ID: 200410281534.12873.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Tom,

> Actually, the definition of the single-parameter variants of age() is
>         age(current_date, $1)
> not
>         age(now(), $1)
>
> I'm not sure this is wrong, but perhaps it should be better documented.

Hmmm ... well, if that's the definition, then we probably don't need to change 
it.  

--Josh

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: 杨邕Date: 2004-10-29 07:26:30
Subject: Insertion Deferrable
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-28 22:22:45
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group