Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock

From: tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock
Date: 2004-10-25 15:42:02
Message-ID: 20041025154202.D12373A4136@svr1.postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock on
the parent table, it's essential that all index accesses take some kind
of lock on the index.  I had missed vacuumlazy.c :-( ...

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/commands:
        vacuumlazy.c (r1.47 -> r1.48)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c.diff?r1=1.47&r2=1.48)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-26 16:05:03
Subject: pgsql: Make heap_fetch API more consistent by having the buffer remain
Previous:From: User DpageDate: 2004-10-25 09:25:44
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Version number bump.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group