Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>,<gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...
Date: 2004-10-22 13:20:59
Message-ID: 200410220920.59168.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Friday 22 October 2004 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: 21 October 2004 23:32
> > To: gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> > Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: [pgsql-www] Problem with pgfoundry ...
> >
> >
> > Just checked the news, and the new beta of pginstaller was
> > released today ... I've just raised MaxClients to 150 from
> > 75, so hopefully that will prevent a recurrance ...
>
> Oops, sorry - did we break it? ;-)
>

Do we need to start thinking of an alternative scheme for getting this out to 
people? I'd imagine the loads we see now will pale in comparason to the loads 
we see once the final release goes out. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Justin CliftDate: 2004-10-22 13:27:42
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-10-22 07:28:46
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group