Re: pg_regress --temp-keep

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress --temp-keep
Date: 2004-10-15 17:32:15
Message-ID: 200410151732.i9FHWFZ10339@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Reini Urban wrote:
> Bruce Momjian schrieb:
> > Uh, why would someone use this option?
>
> after fixing a minor issue, not to wait for a full
> de-install / install and test database loss.
>
> minor issues can be regression tests updates, or updated single binaries.

Seems to be of too limited a usage.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Lewczuk 2004-10-15 17:52:50 Re: postgresql 8.0 with cygwin - success
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-15 17:27:07 Re: plperl Safe restrictions