Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL 2003 conformance

From: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Date: 2004-10-14 00:29:02
Message-ID: 20041013172902.H14574@cookie.varlena.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
I have a couple of the new features written up, but nothing
like an entire review.  If someone can tackle this job
and wants help, I'll help (but I cannot sign up for the
whole thing).  Or if someone wants the material
on the items I have done, just email me.

--elein
elein(at)varlena(dot)com

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:52:24PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards 
> conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003?  I know that 
> several features were added or revised for SQL 2003 conformance, so it 
> would be nice to have that documented for the 8.0 release.
> 
> I think an overview of how the structure of SQL 2003 differs from SQL 
> 1999 would also help the group to analyse the individual feature groups 
> more quickly.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-10-14 07:14:13
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-10-12 17:52:24
Subject: SQL 2003 conformance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group