Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_restore - added documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore - added documentation
Date: 2004-10-13 14:24:53
Message-ID: 200410131424.i9DEOr725376@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
OK, wording updated and applied.  I used "process" instead of "issue".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > However, I wonder if "output database" is the proper name for -d? 
> > Isn't it more "restore database" or "target database"?
> 
> "restore database name" sounds like, "When this option is specified, 
> only the database name is restored.".  "target database" sounds a lot 
> better.
> 
> Your other change, "issue commands" may be interpreted incorrectly.  
> When not restoring to a database, the commands are in fact "output", 
> not "issued".  Not sure how to make that clear, though I don't much 
> like "issue" either way, because it doesn't have a precise meaning.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-10-13 14:32:31
Subject: Re: pg_restore - added documentation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-10-13 13:49:08
Subject: Re: pg_restore - added documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group