Re: Win32 Version patch

Patch applied. Thanks.

I made the wording correction suggested by Dave Page.

Cleaned up patch attached. I think the impact is minimal as I renamed
some things and moved the binary description up to the top of the
Makefile so it looks like a comment.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> > > Evening committers,
> > >
> > > Any ideas when Magnus' win32 version numbering patch is
> > likely to get
> > > applied?
> >
> > Good question. Last I saw it it was quite large. Magnus,
> > would you post a new version so we can look it over again. I
> > have no problem with the binary file you suggested.
>
> Not really, since I haven't changed anything. But I can send the same
> patch again. Last time I sent it there were no comments, so I knew of
> nothing further to change. If there are more changes wanted, just tell
> me what to change...
>
> The only remaining discussion I recall was possibly moving of the ico
> file to a different directory. Which I said I'd happily leave up to the
> committers :-) If you tell me where you want it I can of course create a
> new patch which uses those dirs... But I don't feel up to deciding about
> new directories myself ;-)
>
> //Magnus
>

Content-Description: win32ver_2.patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description: pgsql.ico

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description: win32ver.rc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073