Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
>>> Sent: 30 September 2004 17:47
>>> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [#14748606]
>>> comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
>>>
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>>> Thank you for the information you provided in your reply. We really
>>>> appreciate your feedback, and we'll keep it in mind as we work to
>>>> improve Google Groups.
>>>
>>> This looks to me like they cut us off for ulterior reasons
>>> and are avoiding
>>> the topic. Does it look that way to anyone else?
>>
>> Yes. I'm just not sure whether it's because we're a database project, or
>> because they're trying to wind down groups.google which I can't imagine
>> makes them a whole lot of cash. Any other theories?
>
> I first thought maybe some commercial db doesn't want us on google, then
> I thought it can't be activity, so it must be that the Usenet group is
> mostly posted through the gateway and not actually posted to from
> Usenet.

You know all of those delay'd postings that I approve? They are all from
the gateway going from news->mail :) So, figure several hundred a week
*easily* ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664