Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2004-09-30 14:24:16
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, John Hansen wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>> Now that archives has moved to commandprompt and changed layout, can we
>>> please get the last-modified issue fixed, before I start the recrawl?
>> What's wrong with the last-modified date?  I checked it the other day, and
>> it looked fine to me ...
> you use <meta tag> for last-modified date, but crawlers does prefer more
> standard way via http headers, as you once did using 'touch' hack
> (what's wrong with it ?)

To be honest, I want to figure out how to do it off of Message Date 
properly, instead of time stamp of the file ... that way, if we have to 
regenerate, all the 'last-modified' do stay the same ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2004-09-30 15:03:56
Subject: Re:
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2004-09-30 14:17:59
Subject: Re:

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group