Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
Date: 2004-09-30 18:06:36
Message-ID: 200409301106.36316.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Tom,

> A different semi-legitimate reason for a cutoff is that, so far as I
> know, the comp.databases.postgresql newsgroups never went through the
> formal vote process to be recognized as legitimate mainstream
> newsgroups.  Back when I was a netnews administrator for CMU, it was
> common practice to refuse to carry groups that hadn't passed such a
> vote, and I imagine it still is.  I haven't heard that Google is getting
> strict about this (and they sure didn't mention it in their comments)
> but if they are then we don't have much of a leg to stand on.

If that's the case, then, they should inform us and we can start a campaign.   
But right now we're getting the brushoff and we need to get their attention.

BTW, how would we go about organizing a legitimacy vote?   Who votes on this?

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Chris RyanDate: 2004-09-30 18:15:18
Subject: Re: New site
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-09-30 18:01:42
Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group