Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server unreliability

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>,PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-29 21:04:01
Message-ID: 200409292304.01401.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Tom Lane wrote:
> We all know perfectly well what the problems are ---
> it's a matter of finding time, and sometimes money, to solve them. 
> We don't need "new ideas" unless the ideas are about how to produce
> those resources.

Throwing more resources at an entity that does not scale won't achieve 
anything.  In order to improve, we need to listen to competing concepts 
and pick the best one, not keep giving the current one more time over 
and over.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-29 21:15:01
Subject: Infrastructure TODO list
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-09-29 20:56:15
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-29 21:15:01
Subject: Infrastructure TODO list
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-09-29 20:56:15
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group