Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Date: 2004-09-21 17:49:46
Message-ID: 20040921174945.GA27988@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 08:47:24AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> 
> I'm amazed...   Sounds like noone is doing any serious work with JDBC, or 
> only has short lived 'applet' kind of applications where long persistance 
> connections aren't an issue.

For what it's worth, this issue has killed me at work, several times
(I'm actually a cat).  We've hacked around it in various ways, but
I'm glad that a real solution is in the 8.0 driver.

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Jaroslaw J. PysznyDate: 2004-09-21 19:25:48
Subject: Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/
Previous:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2004-09-21 13:20:21
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group