Re: Draft Seven

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft Seven
Date: 2004-09-09 01:33:15
Message-ID: 200409082133.15871.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wednesday 08 September 2004 19:22, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> The criteria for inclusion previously was major feature contributors - now
> it seems to be something else. What is the rationale now? If that is
> clearly stated, I'll be happy, as long as it isn't specifically crafted to
> exclude. As an aside, 2nd Quadrant's view would be that PostgreSQL is a
> strategic part of their overall I.T. plan - as I dare say do about 12-20
> other contributors.
>

Um.. not really commenting on your email, but just curious what 2nd Quadrent
does, and what role PostgreSQL plays in its IT picture. TIA.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2004-09-09 01:36:17 Re: your posting
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-09-08 23:23:40 Re: LinuxWorld, London Olympia Oct 6th/7th